Scalable Advanced Work Packaging (AWP) is real and not too expensive to bring meaningful returns on small cap, brownfield projects with a TIC as low as $50k. From $50k to $50B, AWP is the right answer for efficient & safe project execution.
If you’re an owner and you aren’t doing scalable AWP on your small cap brownfield projects, you are already behind. If you think any of these excuses are valid, you’re incorrect:
One challenge that we often see at small cap projects is that most of these brownfield projects don’t have sufficiently attributed engineering models to drive automation. That’s okay. Non-graphical WorkFace Planning and disciplined constraint management still add significant value. Owners have documented as much as a 20% increase in field productivity without the use of any graphical WorkFace Planning. The automation that results from a well attributed 3D model certainly brings efficiency to the AWP program, which leads to a reduction in the cost and number of WorkFace Planners that are required. At the end of the day, however, the majority of the field productivity benefits come from better planning and improved constraint management not from slick 3D model interfaces.
Another objection we often hear is that change management is too difficult at existing facilities. It is true that the change management challenge tends to be greater at existing operating facilities, but it is certainly not insurmountable. We have found that introducing change at existing plants can be a greater challenge due to the more engrained nature of the systems and processes. Often the same personnel have been doing the same job the same way for decades. This leads to more institutional inertia that has to be overcome. In greenfield environments, you have a new team coming together for a new scope so the ability to introduce change can be greater.
The advantage of small cap brownfield projects however, is that you have an evergreen portfolio of projects with rolling start dates that allow you to introduce change slowly over a series of multiple projects. In large cap greenfield projects you have to introduce all of the change at once and then lock in your project execution approach for the duration of the project. With small cap you can follow a “crawl, walk, run” approach over the course of several projects while limiting the change being introduced on any one project. This also has the added benefit of allowing you to learn lessons quickly and apply them to subsequent projects, which helps to refine your AWP process. What we have seen work well is the initial introduction of just Installation Work Packages, followed by the expansion to properly managed and released Construction Work Packages and then expansion both upstream and downstream into engineering and testing.
Another advantage of change management at operating facilities is the owner often serves as the construction manager which means that the owner has more ability to drive change in how the projects are executed than in some greenfield environments. Smaller embedded site contractors tend to be more amenable to these owner-driven changes than some of the larger EPC firms with more established systems and processes. Also, with embedded contractors, the delays associated with a bidding process can be removed, making it easier to get the contractor’s input during the engineering phases, when they can help to influence the design and lower the overall TIC with effective constructability and planning.
Another objection to scalable AWP that we have heard is that software tools are cost prohibitive for small cap projects. While this used to be the case, it is no longer true. With the emergence of web-based solutions that do not require expensive hardware to support thick client on-premise deployments, the total cost of ownership of AWP software solutions has decreased significantly. O3 has seen success with the rollout of its software across entire portfolios of small cap projects which further helps to defray the cost. Legacy on-premise solutions that do not support multiple projects and lack the ability to provide cross-project reporting are not a good fit for scalable AWP but these dinosaur technologies are on their way out. Modern, web-based tools like O3 are the future of construction software.
Example of cross project reporting across a portfolio of small cap projects in O3
Some Advice for Launching your Scalable AWP program
To learn more about how O3 can enhance your projects, schedule your personalized demo today.